Feasibility analysis of the composting of pig waste

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/2764747101022012041

Keywords:

hogs, environment, feasibility, composting

Abstract

This work analyzes the economic feasibility of composting manure. The study looked beyond the field of literature data on a case study. The state of Santa Catarina stands out for volume production of pigs, being the first in the nation in pork production. Aiming to achieve the desired sustainability in the pig industry, it is necessary to develop alternatives that enable the system, both in terms of financial, economic and environmental. The treatment system of pig manure by composting process has the challenge to transform them from environmental liabilities in financial assets, environmental and even leave them in a position to generate income or still in use without environmental burden on the property itself. We present a case study of a composting project for a production unit piglet (UPL) with 950 pigs which rose the necessary investments, maintenance costs and production and also the prediction result which allowed the calculating the economic return on investment. Finally, it is concluded that composting of pig manure proves economically viable addition to the environmental benefits related to water resources, soil and atmosphere.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marino Luiz Eyerkaufer, Santa Catarina State University, UDESC, Brazil.

PhD in Production Engineering from the Santa Catarina Federal University, UFSC, Brazil.

Has a Master’s degree in Accounting Sciences from the Blumenau Regional University Foundation, FURB, Brazil.

Specialist in Marketing from the Western Santa Catarina University, UNOESC, Brazil.

Graduated in Accounting at the Western Santa Catarina University, UNOESC, Brazil.

Professor at the Santa Catarina State University, UDESC, Brazil.

André de Oliveira Brito, Santa Catarina State University, UDESC, Brazil.

Graduated in Business Administration with a Qualification in Human Resources at the Itapiranga University, FAI, Brazil.

References

ANIMAL WORLD. Características do 4º maior produtor e exportador de carne suína. 2008. Disponível em: http://www.porkexpo.com.br/index.php/pasta/18/. Acessado em 01/11/08.

BONETT, Lucimar Pereira, MONTICELLI, Cícero Juliano. Coleção 500 perguntas, 500 respostas. 2. ed. EMBRAPA Suínos e Aves, 1998.

GITMAN, Lawrence, J. Princípios de Administração Financeira. 3. ed. São Paulo: Harper e Row do Brasil, 1984.

LEONE, George Sebastião Guerra. Custos, Planejamento, Implantação e Controle. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.

LPC - Tecnologia Ambiental. Sistema de tratamento para dejetos suínos. 2009. Disponível em: http://www.umac.com.br/. Acesso em 11/06/09.

OLIVEIRA, Paulo Armando Victorio. HIGARASHI, Martha, Mayumi. Unidade de Compostagem para o Tratamento dos Dejetos de Suínos. 2006. Disponível em: http://www.cnpsa.embrapa.br/down.php?tipo=publicacoes&cod_publicacao=918. Acessado em 01/11/08.

PRÁ, Marcos Antonio Daí; CORRÊIA, Érico Kunde; CORRÊIA, Luciara Bilhalva; LOBO, Marcio da Silva; SPEROTTO, MORES, Edgar. Compostagem como Alternativa para Gestão Ambiental na Produção de Suínos. Porto Alegre: Evangraf, 2009.

PRÁ, Marcos Antonio Daí. Desenvolvimento de um Sistema de Compostagem para Tratamento de Dejetos Suínos. 2006. Disponível em: http://www.ufpel.tche.br/faem/zootecnia/dissertacoes_teses/resumos/msc/Dai_Pra.pdf. Acessado em 01/11/08.

PRÁ, Marcos. Antonio Daí, KONZEN, Egídio, Arno. OLIVEIRA, Paulo, Armando. MORES, Edgar. Compostagem de Dejetos Líquidos de Suínos. 2005. Disponível em: http://www.cnpms.embrapa.br/publicacoes/publica/2005/documento/Doc_45.pdf. Acessado em 01/11/08.

SANTOS, Joel J., Análise de Custos. 4ª ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2005.

SILVEIRA, Paulo R. S.; SOBESTIANSKY, Júri j; WENTZ, Ivo; SESTI, Luiz A. C. Produção, Manejo e Saúde do Rebanho. EMBRAPA, 1998.

Published

2012-12-14

How to Cite

Eyerkaufer, M. L., & Brito, A. de O. (2012). Feasibility analysis of the composting of pig waste. Revista Brasileira De Contabilidade E Gestão, 1(2), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.5965/2764747101022012041

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)