Consumer profile of pork in the Curu Valley, Brazil: Consumption habits and perceptions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/22381171e27959

Keywords:

Consumer profile, Eating habits, Pork, Consumption behavior, Food safety

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize the profile and consumption habits of pork consumers in the Curu Valley region of Ceará, Brazil. A total of 87 electronic questionnaires were administered between February and July 2025, collecting data on age, income, consumption frequency, purchasing location, and perceptions regarding pork. The results indicate that most consumers were between 18 and 20 years old, had completed secondary education, and reported monthly household incomes ranging from one to three minimum wages. Pork was consumed weekly by 52.3% of respondents, predominantly at lunch (95.3%), with specialized meat shops representing the main point of purchase (61.6%). The most preferred cuts were pork ribs (66.3%) and pork loin chops (64%), generally prepared roasted (48.8%). Quality and freshness were the most important criteria at the time of purchase (58.1%), and more than half of respondents (54.7%) reported inquiring about the meat's origin. Although pork was positively perceived in terms of flavor and nutritional value—particularly its high-quality protein and essential mineral content—cultural misconceptions persisted, especially regarding fat content and disease transmission. A considerable proportion of respondents also reported washing pork, highlighting gaps in their food safety knowledge. Addressing these issues requires targeted educational campaigns in schools, health facilities, and community spaces, with an emphasis on dispelling misconceptions and disseminating scientifically grounded practices for the safe handling and preparation of pork.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Yasmim Barros Araújo, Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology of Ceará, Umirim, CE, Brazil

    É aluna do 2o ano do Curso Técnico Integrado em Agropecuária e bolsista PIBIC Jr do IFCE Campus Umirim, no projeto intitulado Perfil dos consumidores de carne suína comercializada no Vale do Curu, sob orientação do professor Francisco Carlos de Sousa.

  • Francisco Carlos de Sousa, Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology of Ceará, Umirim, CE, Brazil

    Possui doutorado em Ciências Veterinárias e é professor do Ensino Básico, Técnico e Tecnológico do IFCE Campus Umirim, onde leciona e desenvolve pesquisas em Ciência Animal.

References

ANJOS CM et al. 2018. Desmistificando a carne suína. Pubvet 12: 1–9.

AUNG MM & CHANG YS. 2014. Temperature management for the quality assurance of a perishable food supply chain. Food Control 40:198–207.

BRYMAN A. 2016. Social research methods. 5.ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

CEARÁ. 2019. Secretaria do Meio Ambiente. Plano das coletas seletivas: Vale do Curu. Disponível em: https://www.sema.ce.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/sites/36/2020/05/VALE-DO-CURU.pdf. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2025.

CEARÁ. 2022. Planejamento participativo & regionalizado: Litoral Oeste/Vale do Curu. 2022. Disponível em: https://www.cearaparticipativo.ce.gov.br/litoral-oeste-vale-do-curu/Acesso em: 10 ago. 2025.

EMBRAPA. 2025. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Carne suína. Disponível em: https://www.embrapa.br/qualidade-da-carne/carne-suina. Acesso em: 10 set. 2025.

FAO/WHO 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations /World Health Organization. General principles of food hygiene (CXC 1-1969). Rome: Codex Alimentarius Commission. Disponível em: https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius. Acesso em: 02 feb. 2026.

FONT-I-FURNOLS M & GUERRERO L. 2014. Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: an overview. Meat Science 98: 361–371.

GIL AC. 2019. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 7.ed. São Paulo: Atlas.

IBGE. 2024. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Estatísticas da produção pecuária: abate de suínos, frangos e bovinos. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. Disponível em: https://www.ibge.gov.br. Acesso em: 11 set. 2025.

IULIETTO MF & EVERS EG. 2024. Cross-contamination in the kitchen: A model for quantitative microbiological risk assessment. Risk Analysis 44: 1156–1175.

KOTLER P & KELLER KL. 2016. Marketing management. 15.ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.

LEYGONIE C et al. 2012. Impact of freezing and thawing on the quality of meat: review. Meat Science 91: 93–98.

PARK JM et al. 2020. Transfer rates of pathogenic bacteria during pork processing. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 62: 912–921.

RESENDE CMC & CAMPOS RML. 2015. Benefícios da carne suína na saúde do consumidor. Nutritime 12: 4458–4459.

TROY DJ & KERRY JP. 2019. Consumer perception and the role of color in meat quality. Meat Science 156: 28–35.

USDA. 2024. United States Department of Agriculture. Livestock and poultry: world markets and trade. Washington: USDA. Disponível em: https://www.fas.usda.gov. Acesso em: 11 set. 2025.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-05

Issue

Section

Research Note - Science of Animals and Derived Products

How to Cite

Consumer profile of pork in the Curu Valley, Brazil: Consumption habits and perceptions. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1–9, 5 Nov.2026.