Impacts of plant arrangement and nitrogen fertilization in the agronomic performance of grain sorghum

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/22381171e28121

Keywords:

Nitrogen topdressing, Row spacing, Sorghum bicolor, Urea, Yield

Abstract

New plant arrangements have proven to be beneficial for soybean cultivation. However, little is known about the performance of sorghum in these arrangements when grown in succession, particularly associated with nitrogen topdressing. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the agronomic performance of grain sorghum grown in double rows and its response to nitrogen topdressing. Two experiments were conducted in the field in the Southwest of the State of Goiás, Brazil. In both, a 2x2 factorial randomized block design was adopted with six replications, corresponding to two row spacings (traditional - 0.50 m and double rows - 0.25x0.75 m) and the use or not of 90 kg ha-1 N as urea in topdressing. The grain sorghum hybrid used was Buster, and plant height, stem diameter, panicle length, shoot dry mass, thousand grain weight, and yield were evaluated. Double-row spacing did not change plant height or thousand-grain weight compared with traditional spacing. However, traditional spacing provided a higher grain yield than the double row spacing at both locations, with increases of 21% in Rio Verde (905 kg ha-1) and 40% in Montividiu (1.879 kg ha-1). The response of grain sorghum to nitrogen topdressing was variable in relation to the environment, with a 16% increase in grain yield in Rio Verde, without any influence from the plant arrangement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Weverton Ferreira Santos, Instituto Federal Goiano

    Instituto Federal Goiano, Graduate Program in Agricultural Sciences – Agronomy, Rio Verde - Brazil

  • Alessandro Guerra da Silva, Universidade de Rio Verde

    Universidade de Rio Verde, Graduate Program in Crop Production, Rio Verde, GO, Brazil

  • Sergio de Oliveira Procópio, EMBRAPA Meio Ambiente

    Embrapa Meio Ambiente, Research Department, Jaguariúna, SP, Brazil

  • Guilherme Braga Pereira Braz, Universidade de Rio Verde

    Universidade de Rio Verde, Graduate Program in Crop Production, Rio Verde, GO, Brazil

  • Adriano Jakelaitis, Instituto Federal Goiano

    Instituto Federal Goiano, Graduate Program in Agricultural Sciences – Agronomy, Rio Verde, GO, Brazil

  • Rafael Lopes Santos Rodrigues, Universidade de Rio Verde

    Universidade de Rio Verde, Graduate Program in Crop Production, Rio Verde, GO, Brazil

  • John Lennon Basílio da Costa, Universidade de Rio Verde

    Universidade de Rio Verde, Graduate Program in Crop Production, Rio Verde, GO, Brazil

References

ALBUQUERQUE CJB et al. 2013. Extração de macronutrientes no sorgo granífero em diferentes arranjos de plantas. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo 12: 10–20.

ALMODARES A et al. 2009. The effects of nitrogen fertilizer on chemical compositions in corn and sweet sorghum. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences 6: 441–446.

ASSEFA Y & STAGGENBORG SA. 2011. Phenotypic changes in grain sorghum over the last five decades. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 197: 249–257.

BATISTA PSC et al. 2017. Performance of grain sorghum hybrids under drought stress using GGE biplot analyses. Genetics and Molecular Research 16: gmr16039761.

BETTIO CS et al. 2017. Produtividade do milho (Zea mays L.) com diferentes arranjos populacionais em linhas simples e duplas. Acta Iguazu 6: 44–51.

BRAZ GBP et al. 2019. Desempenho agronômico e supressão de plantas daninhas no sorgo em semeadura adensada. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias 18: 170–177.

BRUNS HA. 2011. Comparisons of single-row and twin-row soybean production in the Mid-South. Agronomy Journal 103: 702–708.

CARMO EL et al. 2020. Agronomic performance of grain sorghum cultivated in double rows space on Brazilian Cerrado. Revista Caatinga 33: 422–432.

CARVALHO FH et al. 2022. Nitrogen availability in grain sorghum under Cerrado conditions. Research, Society and Development 11: e57611831306.

CLIMATE-DATA. 2021. Dados climáticos para cidades mundiais. Available at: <https://pt.climate-data.org/>. Accessed at: 1 oct. 2025.

CONAB. 2026. COMPANHIA NACIONAL DE ABASTECIMENTO. Acompanhamento da safra brasileira: grãos, safra 2025/26, 4º levantamento. Brasília: Conab. Available in: <https://www.gov.br/conab/pt-br/atuacao/informacoes-agropecuarias/safras/safra-de-graos/boletim-da-safra-de-graos/4o-levantamento-safra-2025-26/4o-levantamento-safra-2025-26>. Accessed at: 21 jan. 2026.

FERREIRA DF. 2011. Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 35: 1039–1042.

FONTES GP et al. 2017. Grain sorghum response to nitrogen fertilizer following cover crops. Agronomy Journal 109: 2723–2737.

FROMME DD et al. 2012. Grain sorghum response to hybrid, row spacing, and plant populations along the upper Texas Gulf Coast. International Journal of Agronomy 2012: 1–5.

GOES RJ et al. 2011. Fontes e doses de nitrogênio em cobertura no sorgo granífero na safrinha. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo 10: 121–129.

KEBENEY SJ et al. 2017. Influence of soybean residue management on nitrate nitrogen accumulation and subsequent sorghum yield in Kanhaplic Haplustults of Western Kenya. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International 13: 1-12.

MORTATE RK et al. 2020. Resposta de sorgo inoculado com Azospirillum brasilense a doses de nitrogênio em cobertura. Revista Ciência Agrícola 18: 65–72.

OBOUR AK et al. 2022. Grain sorghum productivity as affected by nitrogen rates and available soil water. Crop Science 62: 1360–1372.

OSTMEYER TJ et al. 2022. Enhancing sorghum yield through efficient use of nitrogen – challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 845443.

RESENDE AV et al. 2009. Adubação maximiza o potencial produtivo do sorgo. Circular Técnica 119. Sete Lagoas: Embrapa Milho e Sorgo.

ROCHA AGC et al. 2020. Agronomic performance of grain sorghum in different spatial arrangements. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 41:1107.

RONCUCCI N et al. 2014. Double row spacing and drip irrigation as technical options in energy sorghum management. Italian Journal of Agronomy 9: 25–32.

SANTI A et al. 2006. Deficiências de macronutrientes em sorgo. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 30: 228–233.

SANTOS HG et al. 2018. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. 5.ed. Brasília: Embrapa.

SANTOS WF et al. 2022. Plant arrangement and nitrogen fertilization in grain sorghum production. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo 21:e1262.

SIGUA CG et al. 2018. Biomass and nitrogen use efficiency of grain sorghum with nitrogen and supplemental irrigation. Agronomy Journal 110: 1119–1127.

SOUZA DMG & LOBATO E. 2004. Cerrado: correção do solo e adubação. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica.

UBERT IP & SOLIGO SC. 2015. Associação de Azospirillum brasilense a doses de nitrogênio na cultura do sorgo silageiro. Enciclopédia Biosfera 11: 220–229.

USDA. 2026. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. Foreign Agricultural Service. Grain: World Markets and Trade – World Production, Markets, and Trade Report. Washington: Global Market Analysis 38. Available in: <https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/grain-world-markets-and-trade-01122026>. Accessed at: 21 jan. 2026.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-05

Issue

Section

Research Article - Science of Plants and Derived Products

How to Cite

Impacts of plant arrangement and nitrogen fertilization in the agronomic performance of grain sorghum. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1–10, 5 Nov.2026.

Most read articles by the same author(s)