Environmental disclosure: a study of Santa Catarina state potentially polluting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5965/2764747104072015017Keywords:
environmental disclosure, sustainability report, performanace assessmentAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the environmental performance of a potentially polluting industrial company's disclosure of the state of Santa Catarina. To achieve this goal, we adopted a research case study, descriptive in nature type, with qualitative and documentary approach to problem regarding the technical procedures. Data were collected in the 2013 Sustainability Report of the company. It was applied the model Environmental Disclosure Evaluation (EDE), consisting of 103 criteria divided into four clusters: (i) environmental management, (ii) consumption of natural resources; (iii) emissions, effluents, waste and impacts; and (iv) legal compliance and financial aspects. The model is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and created from the Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Support Constructivist (MCDA-C). As an overall result, it was found that the average rate performance achieved by the company was 31.23 points representing considered "moderate." There was a greater commitment of the company with information on the areas of environmental management, natural resource consumption, emissions and waste, items valued with "strong/moderate" performance. It found a "low" performance criteria for wastewater, and transportation products; and "null" for biodiversity and legal compliance items.
Downloads
References
BELLEN, H. M. VAN. Indicadores de sustentabilidade: uma análise comparativa. 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2005.
BEUREN, I. M.; BOFF, M. L.; HORN, J. E.; HORN, M. A. Adequação da Evidenciação Social das Empresas de Capital Aberto no Relatório da Administração e Notas Explicativas às Recomendações da NBC T 15. RCO - Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, v. 4, n. 8, p. 47–68, 2010.
BORGES, F. H.; TACHIBANA, W. K. A evolução da preocupação ambiental e seus reflexos no ambiente dos negócios : uma abordagem histórica. In: XII Simpep. Anais... p.5235–5242, 2005. Bauru.
BRAGA, C. Contabilidade ambiental: ferramenta para a gestão da sustentabilidade. São Paulo (SP): Atlas, 2007.
BRASIL. Lei nº. 10.165, de 27 de Dezembro de 2000. Dispõe sobre a Política Nacional do Meio Ambiente, seus fins e mecanismos de formulação e aplicação, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília-DF. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L10165.htm. Acesso em: 10/07/ 2012.
CALIXTO, L. Uma análise da evidenciação ambiental de companhias brasileiras – de 1997 a 2005. Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, v. 10, n. 1, 2009.
CORTEZ, R. C.; BELLEN, H. M. VAN; ZARO, E. S. Ferramentas de Responsabilidade Social: uma análise comparativa a partir das dimensões e modelos de RSC. XXXVIII Encontro da ANPAD. Anais... p.1–16, 2014. Rio de Janeiro.
CRESPO, C. S., RIPOLL, V.F., ROSA, F. S., LUNKES, R.J. Modelo Ede-environmentaldisclosure evaluation. Resultados de pesquisa. Valencia: Quaderns de treball. Facultad de Economía.Universitat de Valencia, 2011.
DAUB, C. H. Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: an alternative methodological approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 15, p. 75–85, 2007. Disponível em: <http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959652605001915>. Acesso em: 29/03/2014.
ELKINGTON, J. Governance for Sustainability. Corporate Governance, v. 14, n. 6, p. 522– 529, 2006.
ENSSLIN, L.; DUTRA, A.; ENSSLIN, S.R. MCDA: A constructivist approach the management of human resources at a governmental agency. International Transactions in Operational Research. n. 7, p. 79-100, 2000.
ENSSLIN, L.; MONTIBELLER, G.N.; e NORONHA, S.M. Apoio à decisão: metodologia para estruturação de problemas e avaliação multicritério de alternativas. Florianópolis: Insular, 2001.
GRI - GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Version 3.1. Amsterdam, 2011.
GRI - GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE. WHAT IS GRI? Disponível em: <https://www.globalreporting.org/information/about-gri/what-is-GRI/Pages/default.aspx>. Acesso em: 21/06/2014a.
GURVITSH, N.; SIDOROVA, I. Survey of Sustainability Reporting Integrated into Annual Reports of Estonian Companies for the years 2007-2010: Based on Companies Listed on Tallinn Stock Exchange as of October 2011. Procedia Economics and Finance, v. 2, p. 26–34, 2012. Disponível em: <http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212567112000615>. Acesso em: 27/07/2014.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GOVERNANÇA CORPORATIVA. Código das melhores
práticas de governança corporativa. 4.ed. 2009. Disponível em: <http://www.ibgc.org.br./>. Acesso em: 10/07/2014.
INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF ACCOUNTANTS (IFAC). Sustainability Framework 2.0. New York: International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), 2011.
KPMG. KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005. Amsterdam, 2005.
KPMG. KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2008. Amsterdam, 2008.
KPMG. KPMG International Responsibility Reporting 2011. Amsterdam, 2011.
NASCIMENTO, E. P. DO. Trajetória da sustentabilidade: do ambiental ao social, do social ao econômico. Estudos Avançados, v. 26, n. 74, p. 51–64, 2012.
NIKOLAEVA, R.; BICHO, M. The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, v. 39, p. 136–157, 2011. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11747-010-0214-5>. Acesso em: 13/07/2014.
OWEN, G. Integrated Reporting: A Review of Developments and their Implications for the Accounting Curriculum. Accounting Education, v. 22, n. 4, p. 340–356, 2013. Disponível em: <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09639284.2013.817798>. Acesso em: 11/02/2014. RICHARDSON, R. J. Pesquisa social: métodos e técnicas. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.
ROSA, F., COSTA, G., PIFITSCHER, E., LUNKES, R.. Termômetro Ambiental: um estudo sobre níveis de comprometimento e desempenho da gestão ambiental em uma empresa do setor fabril do estado de Santa Catarina.AmbienteContábil, v.4. n. 2, p. 18-39, jul/dez. 2012.
SCHALTEGGER, S.; BURRITT, R. L. Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders? Journal of World Business, v. 45, n. 4, p. 375–384, 2010. Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM), Leuphana University of Lueneburg, Scharnhorststr. 1, 21335 Lueneburg, Germany. Disponível em: <http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77956463638&partnerID=40&md5=f9dee95faa7c5b25bee73571e83c5723>.
SOARES, S. V.; SILVEIRA, E. D. DA; PFITSCHER, E. D.; SIRIDAKIS, C. Informações Ambientais em notas explicativas das empresas dos programas “Novo Mercado” e “Em boa Companhia” da BM&FBOVESPA. Revista de Contabilidade do Mestrado em Ciências Contábeis da UERJ (online), v. 17, n. Ed. Especial, p. 70–82, 2012.
TINOCO, J. E. P. .; KRAEMER, M. E. P. Contabilidade e gestão ambiental. São Paulo (SP): Atlas, 2004.
YIN, R.K. Estudo de Caso: Planejamento e métodos. 3. ed. Tradução Daniel Grassi. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Ilaci Pavesi, Elise Soerger Zaro, Rogerio João Lunkes, Fabricia Silva Rosa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Brazilian Journal of Accounting and Management offers free and immediate access to its content, following the principle that providing scientifical knowledge in a free manner promotes a better world democratization of knowledge. Authors maintain copyright of articles and grant to the journal the rights of the first publication, according to the Creative Commons Attribution licensing criteria, which allows the work to be shared with initial publication and authorship recognition. These licenses allow others to distribute, remix, adapt, or create derived work, even if it is for commercial purposes, provided that the credit is given to the original creation.